Structural Analysis and Synthesis (eBook)

A Laboratory Course in Structural Geology

Stephen M. Rowland, Ernest M. Duebendorfer, Alexander Gates (Autoren)

eBook Download: EPUB

2021 | 4. Auflage
288 Seiten
Wiley-Blackwell (Verlag)
978-1-119-53548-5 (ISBN)

Infos

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS & SYNTHESIS

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS & SYNTHESIS A LABORATORY COURSE IN STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY

Structural Analysis and Synthesis is the best-selling laboratory manual of its kind. Specifically designed to support the laboratory work of undergraduates in structural geology courses, the book helps students analyze the various aspects of geological structures, and to combine their analyses into an overarching synthesis.

This book is intended for use in the laboratory portion of a first course in structural geology. As is explicit in the book's title, it is concerned with both the analysis and synthesis of structural features. In this fourth edition, the has been broadened to include a range of new content and features, including:

Video content that demonstrates how to perform some of the more challenging structural geology techniques

An acknowledgment of the increasing importance of environmental applications of structural geology - vital to students who may go on to pursue careers in the environmental sphere

An increased emphasis on quantitative techniques, complete with descriptions of computer program applications

Contingent with this quantitative emphasis, the book also outlines the limitations of such techniques, helping students to appropriately apply the techniques and evaluate their trustworthiness

Structural Analysis and Synthesis is a renowned and widely recognized aid to students in grasping and mastering the techniques required in structural geology, and will find a home wherever the principles and practices of structural geology are taught.

About the Authors

Stephen M. Rowland is Professor Emeritus of Geology at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA.

Ernest M. Duebendorfer is Professor Emeritus of Geology at Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.

Alexander Gates is Distinguished Service Professor & Chair in the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA.

Inhalt

Preface

Chapter 1 Attitudes of Lines and Planes

Chapter 2 Outcrop Patterns and Structure Contours

Chapter 3 Stereographic Projection

Chapter 4 Folds and Cross Sections

Chapter 5 Stereographic Analysis of Folded Rocks

Chapter 6 Rotations and Determining Original Directions in Folded Rocks

Chapter 7 Foliations, Parasitic Folds, and Superposed Folds

Chapter 8 Strain Measurements in Ductile Rocks

Chapter 9 Advanced Strain Measurements

Chapter 10 Brittle Failure

Chapter 11 Analysis of Fracture Systems

Chapter 12 Faults

Chapter 13 Dynamic and Kinematic Analysis of Faults

Chapter 14 Structural Synthesis

Chapter 15 Deformation Mechanisms in Mylonites

Chapter 16 Construction of Balanced Cross Sections

Chapter 17 Introduction to Plate Tectonics

Chapter 18 Virtual Fieldtrip

Textauszug

1
Attitudes of Lines and Planes

Objectives

• Measure planes and lines in the field using standard techniques.
• Become familiar with the azimuth and quadrant methods for defining the orientations of planes, lines, and lines within planes.
• Draw and read back orientations on maps.

This chapter investigates the orientations of lines and planes in space. The structural elements that we measure in the field are lines and planes, and analyzing them on paper or on a computer screen helps us visualize and understand geologic structures in three dimensions. In this chapter, we examine nomenclature, measurement, and representation of these structural elements. Solving apparent‐dip problems is commonly also included in a chapter on lines and planes, but these problems are much more easily solved using a stereonet and will be included in Chapter 3.

All orientations contain two components: an inclination and a declination. The declination is a horizontal angle of rotation from a reference point, most commonly true north. Declinations include the strike of a planar feature (Figure 1.1) and the trend of a linear feature (Figure 1.2). Inclination is the angle that a plane or line is sloped relative to the horizontal plane of the earth’s surface. For planes, this quantity is the dip (Figure 1.1), and for lines, it is the plunge (Figure 1.2).

The orientation of planar features is measured with a strike and dip. By convention, they are labeled strike, dip, and dip‐direction, though there are variations. The dip direction is the quadrant toward which the dip is inclined. Dips must be perpendicular to their corresponding strike and are indicated by the dip direction. A northeast (NE) strike, for example, can only have a southeast (SE) or northwest (NW) dip direction. The orientation of linear features is measured with trend and plunge and is reported as plunge/trend. Lines do not require a dip direction, so the written orientation is readily distinguished from that of a plane.

There are two ways of expressing the strikes of planes and the trends of lines (Figure 1.3). The azimuth method is based on a 360° clockwise circle and the quadrant method is based on the four 90° compass quadrants – north, south, east, and west. The quadrant system is the most commonly used in the United States, but in other countries the azimuth system is the convention. Strikes are traditionally measured from the north‐half of the transit or compass, but it is understood that the line extends in both directions. Unless horizontal, trends must be measured from the direction that they plunge, so they can be in any direction.

Figure 1.1 Strike and dip of a plane.

Figure 1.2 Trend and plunge of an apparent dip.

Figure 1.3 Azimuth and quadrant methods of expressing compass directions.

A plane that strikes due northwest–southeast and dips 50° southwest could be described as 315°, 50°SW (azimuth) or N45°W, 50°SW (quadrant). Similarly, a line that trends due west and plunges 30° may be described as 30°/270° in azimuth (sometimes written as 30° → 270° or 30°, 270°) or 30°/N90°W in quadrant. For azimuth notation, always use three digits (e.g. 008°, 065°, 255°), so that a bearing cannot be confused with a dip (one or two digits). In this book, the strike is given before the dip, and the plunge is given before the trend. We recommend that you use the azimuth convention in your work. It is much easier to make errors reading a bearing in quadrant notation (two letters and a number) than in azimuth notation (a single number). In addition, when entering orientation data into a computer program or spreadsheet file, it is much faster to enter azimuth notation because there are fewer characters to enter.

The method for measuring planes and lines in the field is to use a pocket transit or a modified compass with a clinometer. Video 1 https://youtu.be/QSrmwSot7Os contains instructions on how to measure lines and planes in the field using both devices. An alternative method of measuring and representing strike and dip is the right‐hand rule. The right‐hand rule requires that you view and measure the strike direction so that the surface dips to your right. For example, the attitude of a plane expressed as 040°, 65°NW could be written as 220°, 65° using the right‐hand rule convention because the 65°NW dip direction would lie to the right of the 220° strike bearing. The system eliminates the need for dip direction. A third but less popular method is dip/dip direction. In this case, the dip angle and its direction (declination) are measured. The dip direction is perpendicular to the strike, so no dip direction is required for this method either. In areas of low dip angles, this can be a simpler and more accurate system because the strike of planes with low dip angles can be difficult to measure and may result in significant errors.

There is a problem measuring declinations because they are meant to be from the geographic North Pole, but a compass or transit measures from the magnetic North Pole. These devices must be adjusted to correct for the difference in location between the poles. The closer the measurement is made to the poles, the more pronounced the correction may be, and the current rapid wandering of the magnetic North Pole is further complicating data collection. There are apps available for smartphones to measure orientations that do not require corrections, but they tend to be less accurate and subject to cell phone coverage. Because inclinations are relative to the earth surface at a specific location, they are only comparable locally. Relative to a fixed point in space, a 30° dip at one location would not be parallel to a 30° dip measured 1000 km away.

Definitions

The following terms are used to describe the orientations of lines and planes. All of these are measured in degrees, so values are typically followed by the degree symbol (°).

Attitude

The orientation in space of a line or plane. By convention, the attitude or orientation of a plane is expressed as its strike and dip; the attitude of a line is expressed as trend and plunge. (syn: orientation).

Bearing

The declination or horizontal angle between a line and a specified coordinate direction, relative to compass directions or in azimuth.

Strike

The bearing of the line of intersection of an inclined plane with the horizontal plane or surface (Figure 1.1). The strike is a line of equal elevation on a dipping plane.

Dip

The vertical angle between an inclined plane and a horizontal line perpendicular to its strike. The maximum angle of inclination on an inclined plane. The direction of dip can be thought of as the direction water would flow down the plane (Figure 1.1).

Trend

The bearing (compass direction or declination) of a line (Figure 1.2). Non‐horizontal lines trend in the down‐plunge direction.

Plunge

The vertical angle of inclination between a non‐horizontal line and the horizontal (Figure 1.2).

Pitch

The angle measured within an inclined plane between a horizontal line and the line in question (Figure 1.4). Also called rake.

Apparent dip

The vertical angle between an inclined plane and a horizontal line that is not perpendicular to the strike of the plane or in true dip direction (Figure 1.2). For any inclined plane, the true dip is always greater than any apparent dip. Note that an apparent dip may be defined by its trend and plunge or by its pitch within a plane.

Figure 1.4 Pitch (or rake) of a line in an inclined plane.

Problem 1.1

Translate the azimuth convention into the quadrant convention, or vice versa.

1. N12°E
2. 298°
3. N86°W
4. N55°E
5. 126°
6. N37°W
7. 233°
8. 270°
9. 083°
10. N3°W

Problem 1.2

Circle those attitudes that are impossible (i.e. a bed with the indicated strike cannot possibly dip in the direction indicated).

1. 314°, 49°NW
2. 086°, 43°W
3. N15°W, 87°NW
4. 345°, 62°NE
5. 062°, 32°S
6. 333°, 15°SE
7. 089°, 43°N
8. 065°, 36°SW
9. N65°W, 54°SE

Problem 1.3

Fault surfaces can contain slip lineations (fault striae). Such slip lineations can be used to determine the orientation of a slip on a fault and, therefore, whether the motion on the fault was strike‐slip, dip‐slip, or oblique‐slip. A geology student who was just learning to use a pocket transit recorded the orientations of five slip lineations on one fault surface. The strike and dip of the fault surface is 320°, 47°NE. The student’s five recorded lineation orientations are recorded in the table below.

Determine which lineation orientations are feasible and which ones must represent a mistake on the part of the student because the given orientation does not lie...

Produkt-Details

• Erscheint lt. Verlag: 18.2.2021
• Sprache: englisch
• Themenwelt: Naturwissenschaften ► Geowissenschaften ► Geologie
• Schlagworte: earth sciences • Geologie • Geologie u. Geophysik • Geology & Geophysics • Geowissenschaften • Structural Geology & Tectonics • Strukturgeologie • Strukturgeologie, Tektonik
• ISBN-10: 1-119-53548-4 / 1119535484
• ISBN-13: 978-1-119-53548-5 / 9781119535485