People v. The Court
The Next Revolution in Constitutional Law
Seiten
2025
Cambridge University Press (Verlag)
978-1-009-65123-3 (ISBN)
Cambridge University Press (Verlag)
978-1-009-65123-3 (ISBN)
The Constitution is designed to ensure that citizens control the government, but the Supreme Court has abused judicial review to undermine popular control of the government. This book proposes changes in constitutional doctrine to enable We the People to reclaim our rightful place as sovereigns in a constitutional democracy.
The Constitution divides power between the government and We the People. It grants We the People an affirmative, collective right to exercise control over the government through our elected representatives. The Supreme Court has abused its power of judicial review and subverted popular control of the government. The Court's doctrine divides constitutional law into rights issues and structural issues. Structural constitutional doctrine ignores the Constitution's division of power between the government and We the People. The Court's rights doctrines fail to recognize that the Constitution grants the People an affirmative, collective right to exercise control over our government. People v. The Court presents an indictment of the Supreme Court's constitutional doctrine. It also provides a set of proposals for revolutionary changes in the practice of judicial review that are designed to enable We the People to reclaim our rightful place as sovereigns in a democratic, constitutional order.
The Constitution divides power between the government and We the People. It grants We the People an affirmative, collective right to exercise control over the government through our elected representatives. The Supreme Court has abused its power of judicial review and subverted popular control of the government. The Court's doctrine divides constitutional law into rights issues and structural issues. Structural constitutional doctrine ignores the Constitution's division of power between the government and We the People. The Court's rights doctrines fail to recognize that the Constitution grants the People an affirmative, collective right to exercise control over our government. People v. The Court presents an indictment of the Supreme Court's constitutional doctrine. It also provides a set of proposals for revolutionary changes in the practice of judicial review that are designed to enable We the People to reclaim our rightful place as sovereigns in a democratic, constitutional order.
David L. Sloss is the John A. and Elizabeth H. Sutro Professor of Law at Santa Clara University.
Foreword: Nine principles for judicial review; Introduction: The problem of democratic decay; 1. A political process theory for the twenty-first century; 2. Four revolutions in constitutional law; 3. Elections; 4. Election-related misinformation; 5. Individual rights under international law; 6. Weak review, strong rights; 7. Federalism; 8. A roadmap for revolutionary change; Appendix.
| Erscheinungsdatum | 14.08.2025 |
|---|---|
| Zusatzinfo | Worked examples or Exercises |
| Verlagsort | Cambridge |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Themenwelt | Recht / Steuern ► EU / Internationales Recht |
| Recht / Steuern ► Öffentliches Recht | |
| Sozialwissenschaften ► Politik / Verwaltung ► Politische Systeme | |
| ISBN-10 | 1-009-65123-4 / 1009651234 |
| ISBN-13 | 978-1-009-65123-3 / 9781009651233 |
| Zustand | Neuware |
| Informationen gemäß Produktsicherheitsverordnung (GPSR) | |
| Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt? |
Mehr entdecken
aus dem Bereich
aus dem Bereich
Das politische System der USA und die Zukunft der Demokratie
Buch | Hardcover (2025)
C.H.Beck (Verlag)
CHF 39,20
Russland, Europa, Amerika
Buch | Softcover (2025)
C.H.Beck (Verlag)
CHF 25,20
