Naked Leftist (eBook)

A Conservative's Perspective to Liberals & Socialists

Randy D. Schiller (Autor)

eBook Download: EPUB

2018 | 1. Auflage
392 Seiten
No-Udder Productions (Verlag)
978-1-7751303-1-4 (ISBN)

Infos

The Naked leftist: A Conservative's Perspective to Understanding Liberals & Socialists delivers legitimate sentiments from a common man; a politically incorrect philosophical enlightenment, a conservative self-help book. As the title suggests, this nonfiction/political science exposition explains and proves with evidence the conviction, the questionable motivation and tactics of a virtuous leftist. Within this 390-page composition, The Naked leftist includes 748 footnotes, to which many readers have described as an encyclopedia. Politics surrounds us; some acknowledge it, others don't. Randy discusses how leftism affects North American politics and culture. What Randy perceived and experienced was neither understood nor shared by many conservatives. Randy exposes the reasoning and the behavior of a virtuous North American leftist. His perception allows freedom minded individuals to understand the leftist doublespeak, the exploits of leftist proletarian warriors, and suggests how one can effectively combat the bankrupt leftist arguments. Although The Naked leftist was published before COVID-19, much of the information presented within The Naked leftist applies to the policies and abuses we've faced since January 2020. This book is a necessity to cultivate and strengthen a conservative or libertarian's knowledge.

Textauszug

INTRODUCTION

 

 

When you possess something, anything, others require (or desire), but you alone control, you make them dependent upon you and therefore, you gain power over them. Simply, the dumber the people, the easier they are to own. The more you expand your horizons (increasing your options) by learning and demonstrating independence, self-reliance and personal initiative, the less power you relinquish to the hands of the nefarious. Financial dependence (as read in the Communist and Regina Manifesto) is the leading idealistic example facilitating empowerment over you.

The most deliberate, willful means of relinquishing your control is suffering a lack of knowledge, relying on and allowing feelings to win over logic, facts, and rational thought. Truth is not relative. Feelings or opinions and factual truth can be opposites. I am not saying that conservatives must be, or are, cold or heartless. There is a distinct difference between compassion and idiocy. Compassion, a basic human necessity, can be a weakness of humankind that will be exploited by the left.

When a conservative argues with a leftist (as we must), I believe knowing more than the others in the room protects us from being taken advantage of. You must educate yourself; read, observe, learn, understand the issues and their consequences. You should simulate debates, prepare accurate rebuttals for potential leftist questions and responses. Researching more than anyone else enables you to create and preserve your sanity and may prevent redistribution of your wealth.

This project began life excoriating socialists, but there are far too many liberals and so-called conservatives that are indistinguishable from socialists. Socialists, Liberals, Progressives, Marxists—they are the same, they are all leftists. They are driven by their “religion.” In this chapter I generalize facts and realities regarding leftists. In subsequent chapters I break down what identifies a leftist, how they speak and the methods they use to sway voters and public opinion while offering proof of my observations. You can apply this knowledge to any leftist throughout the world.

I define a leftist as anyone left of myself; I realize many of you as readers do not self-identify as a strong conservative like myself. This does not matter, for the modest proofs supporting my personal observation elicited within succeeding chapters apply to anyone left of oneself. For those of you struggling to understand leftists, your view may be like mine but in any case, a leftist can be defined as any mainstream socialist, Communist, Marxist sympathizer. Many may consider themselves as liberal and in part or in whole fall under this definition. Unfortunately, I find most liberals today are undistinguishable from Marxists. Sadly, I find many who call themselves conservative are more socialist than conservative. Your leftist list will not be limited to mainstream media, nor Hollywood and other entertainers, nor politicians… for many of your friends, relatives, neighbors can be classified as leftist if they exude any or all the points, I mention within these pages. This begs the question concerning these conservatives, liberals; have they been brainwashed, cajoled under political correctness or does it come naturally? If it comes naturally I see no hope in re-education or enlightenment.

Our North American founders and ancestors were rugged, individualistic, self-reliant. Times have certainly, categorically, changed. Our “modern” North American society has become a selfish, self-indulgent, wimpified collective.

Day after day, year after year, election after election, leftists’ methods become familiar. Rarely subtle, always nefarious and subversive, a leftist attacks identifiable human targets with unsubstantiated accusations (demonizing); using arguments that lack fact or substance, or inciting emotions of envy, resentment, compassion, distrust and fear. They continuously charge that conservatives are self-centered, uncaring, divisive, inhuman to anyone else but themselves. Essentially, they paint conservatives as a heartless group of rich, white men. Try that on Herman Cain or Ben Carson. Even Malcom X, Martin Luther King and Jimi Hendrix were reportedly Republican.

Believing themselves to be social redeemers, leftists treat conservatives as mortal enemies. Their vile, limitless hatred for conservatives displays no boundaries. Conservatives are evil demons requiring eradication at all costs. The left proclaims, “conservatives prevent us from attaining or progressing to our utopian dream.” The leftist dreams of a brave new world, of social engineering…transformation of the way you, all of us, live and even think.

It is no dream, it is now an endless living nightmare as our nations now realize a concerted subversive effort to inflict leftism upon us all.

The leftists’ weak and detestable intolerance of behaviors and opinions that differ from their own becomes so strong it can evoke violent, eruptive demonstrations against conservatism. Those are the true radicals—by the leftist definition conservatives are not radicals. We witnessed much of this intolerance on news broadcasts from the 1960s through the ’70s. Anti-war demonstrations for peace were hardly peaceful. During the 1990s we witnessed intolerance during demonstrations throughout the Oka crisis in Ontario and from anti-fracking Canadian native groups. Anti-fracking native groups are not environmentalists; I have seen first-hand how our First Nations are not stewards of the lands. The leftist civil disobedience continues today with Occupy Wall Street and the violence within cities like Ferguson, Baltimore and Milwaukee. Those enlightening demonstrations have more to do with leftism’s greedy capitalistic wants than being a cause for Black Lives Matter or even the green movement to save Mother Earth for her children.

The leftist’s vision of what it means to be conservative is out of focus. The leftist feels they know everything there is to know about conservatives, but this this enduring perception is based on falsehoods and anecdotal conversation with other leftists rather than on actual engagement with conservatives.

 

Tactics of engagement
 

Because leftists have an overwhelming emotional bias, their reactions can be irrational. Anger and violence are tools used to confront their enemies (conservatives), which is contrary to the facade of tolerance, acceptance and love of all they present. So, when confronted by an angry leftist, neutralize them, place them on the defensive, counter-attack. Expose them for who they really are. Rather than being reactionary or defensive, conservatives must attack leftism with the left’s Alinsky tactics. (This will be discussed more fully in the opening chapter.)

Short on facts, truth or even rational thought, leftists will nimbly resort to unsubstantiated personal attacks, sometimes physical, but always with the goal of demonizing an opposer’s character. Upon sensing their own defeat, we are likely to be branded as a redneck, right wing, Fascist, racist, homophobic, xenophobic, Nazi, or terrorist. Another maneuver or tactic (which can be used in tandem with others), is the leftist “I can’t believe it’s true” laugh. That little chuckle reveals a desperate effort to convince anyone listening that the speaker is alone in his beliefs, or lacking in logic. The robotic Hillary Clinton cackles like an actor on cue when grilled on her numerous controversies and statements.

Cursed with a high anxiety index, leftists derive their inner strength by amassing as a collective. They surround themselves with like-minded wolf packs. Feeling threatened by uncertainty and ambiguity, a leftist also exposes a high uncertainty avoidance. They fear to tread into the unknown.

Exploiting that very fear of the unknown is a constant attack tactic overtly browbeaten against conservatives, but also widely directed toward troops of compliant, uninformed emotional voters. It was effectively utilized to secure a couple of wins in Saskatchewan provincial elections (1991 thru 2003). Back then, our leftist NDP ammo of choice was Medi-scare. Their attacks convinced enough of Saskatchewan’s populace that a conservative government would dismantle provincial healthcare by closing hospitals. Then, after their October 1991 win, the NDP expeditiously closed 52 rural (of the 112) hospitals in April 1993. During their 15-year reign of pain, the NDP also closed 176 schools, eliminated 1,200 long-term care beds and raised taxes 21 times.

During Saskatchewan’s 2007 provincial election, the NDP, on the ropes, attempted to portray the Official Leader of the Opposition, Brad Wall of the Saskatchewan Party, as a “wolf in sheep’s clothing” with numerous political attack ads.1 Thankfully it failed horribly. The Saskatchewan populace had enough of the leftist frauds, government misspending, and constant government corruption. The NDP were finally decimated in a landslide victory for the SaskParty, which had only been formed a decade earlier.

The fear tactics weren’t just used at the provincial level, but nationally as well. Canada’s federal NDP attempted Medi-scare branding against federal Conservatives between the 1960s to present. Tommy Douglas, the leftist messiah, was edified as the father of Medicare and his sacred legacy was not to be touched. Descendants Shirley Douglas and Kiefer Sutherland (her son with Donald Sutherland) pompously marched on numerous occasions espousing his name and defiantly claiming he had wanted to be even further to the left. Shirley, like many leftists, was also no stranger to using violence as a persuasive tactic, having had a brief stint with the Black Panthers and being...

Produkt-Details

• Erscheint lt. Verlag: 14.5.2018
• Sprache: englisch
• Themenwelt: Sozialwissenschaften ► Politik / Verwaltung
• ISBN-10: 1-7751303-1-2 / 1775130312
• ISBN-13: 978-1-7751303-1-4 / 9781775130314