Dogmatikblindheit im Mehrebenensystem
Seiten
2026
Mohr Siebeck (Verlag)
978-3-16-200046-0 (ISBN)
Mohr Siebeck (Verlag)
978-3-16-200046-0 (ISBN)
- Noch nicht erschienen (ca. Mai 2026)
- Versandkostenfrei
- Auch auf Rechnung
- Artikel merken
Viktoria Kraetzig develops a paradigm for the interface of doctrinal concepts in the European multi-level system. According to it, national law and EU law are linked in such a way that EU law establishes requirements for national private law in terms of its substance and, in some cases, its form, but never in terms of its doctrinal principles.
In the European multi-level system, national law and EU law are linked in such a way that EU law establishes requirements for national private law in terms of its substance and, in some cases, its form, but never in terms of its doctrinal principles. Viktoria Kraetzig develops a paradigm for processing EU law in the national legal orders: the "blindness" of the higher level towards doctrinal concepts of the lower level. She points out that the legal actors in the Member States shall not use their own conceptual frameworks to interpret EU law and impose doctrinal thinking of their own system on it. Accordingly, the questions referred to the CJEU must be free of doctrinal assumptions inherent in the national systems as the court, as an actor of Union law, cannot be familiar with them. The CJEU delivers its judgments without knowledge of doctrinal concepts of the Member States legal orders' and without adjusting its answers to national doctrinal thinking.
In the European multi-level system, national law and EU law are linked in such a way that EU law establishes requirements for national private law in terms of its substance and, in some cases, its form, but never in terms of its doctrinal principles. Viktoria Kraetzig develops a paradigm for processing EU law in the national legal orders: the "blindness" of the higher level towards doctrinal concepts of the lower level. She points out that the legal actors in the Member States shall not use their own conceptual frameworks to interpret EU law and impose doctrinal thinking of their own system on it. Accordingly, the questions referred to the CJEU must be free of doctrinal assumptions inherent in the national systems as the court, as an actor of Union law, cannot be familiar with them. The CJEU delivers its judgments without knowledge of doctrinal concepts of the Member States legal orders' and without adjusting its answers to national doctrinal thinking.
Born 1990; Doctorate 2021 and habilitation 2025 at Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main; Privatdozentin there.
| Erscheint lt. Verlag | 30.5.2026 |
|---|---|
| Reihe/Serie | Jus Privatum |
| Verlagsort | Tübingen |
| Sprache | deutsch |
| Maße | 155 x 232 mm |
| Themenwelt | Recht / Steuern ► Allgemeines / Lexika |
| Recht / Steuern ► EU / Internationales Recht | |
| Recht / Steuern ► Privatrecht / Bürgerliches Recht | |
| Schlagworte | Auslegung • EuGH • Europarecht • Harmonisierung • Mehrebenensystem • Methodologie • nationale Rechtsordnung • Privatrechtsdogmatik • Rechtsanwendung • Rechtsdogmatik • Rechtsdogmatikblindheit • Rechtsquellen • Rechtsvergleichung • Richtlinienrecht • Systemtheorie • Unionsrecht • Verordnungsrecht • Vertikaldogmatik • Vorabentscheidungsverfahren |
| ISBN-10 | 3-16-200046-7 / 3162000467 |
| ISBN-13 | 978-3-16-200046-0 / 9783162000460 |
| Zustand | Neuware |
| Informationen gemäß Produktsicherheitsverordnung (GPSR) | |
| Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt? |
Mehr entdecken
aus dem Bereich
aus dem Bereich
Sammlung des Zivil-, Straf- und Verfahrensrechts, Rechtsstand: 6. …
Buch | Hardcover (2025)
C.H.Beck (Verlag)
CHF 53,20
Buch | Softcover (2023)
Franz Vahlen (Verlag)
CHF 27,70
Planung - Lernstrategie - Zeitmanagement
Buch | Softcover (2025)
Franz Vahlen (Verlag)
CHF 39,95
