Kindeswohl und internationale Zuständigkeit
Eine Untersuchung anhand von Brüssel IIb-VO und UnthVO
Seiten
2026
Mohr Siebeck (Verlag)
9783162001689 (ISBN)
Mohr Siebeck (Verlag)
9783162001689 (ISBN)
- Noch nicht erschienen (ca. Januar 2026)
- Versandkostenfrei
- Auch auf Rechnung
- Artikel merken
Für Familien mit Bezug zu mehreren Staaten stellt sich bei einem Konflikt über Sorge oder Kindesunterhalt die Frage, welcher Staat für die Entscheidung zuständig ist. Eng mit dem Kindeswohl als dem familienrechtlichen Leitprinzip verknüpft ist nicht erst die Sachentscheidung, sondern bereits die Bestimmung der internationalen Zuständigkeit.
The principle of the best interests of the child, guaranteed by Article 24(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, must be complied with when drafting and interpreting rules on jurisdiction in European family law. Although the EU legislator has essentially fulfilled its obligations under Article 24(2), further legislative improvements to strengthen the best interests of the child in jurisdiction law are still possible. Regarding the interpretation of the Brussels IIb Regulation and the Maintenance Regulation, the case law of the ECJ is not consistent. Although the Court regularly refers to the best interests of the child, its reasoning often remains one-dimensional. In fact, the significance of the principle depends on the regulatory context: the best interests of the child in matters of parental responsibility differ from those in maintenance law. Thus, the best interests of the child within the meaning of the Maintenance Regulation tend to reinforce the general objective of the Regulation, which is to protect the maintenance creditor. The situation is more complex in the jurisdiction system of the Brussels IIb Regulation. The various general grounds for jurisdiction, e.g., jurisdiction at the child's habitual residence, are based on certain ideas about where conducting proceedings typically serves the interests of the child. If these general rules do not optimally reflect the individual situation, the agreement and transfer of jurisdiction allow for responding to the individual case. Both the standardised and case-specific rules on jurisdiction are based on overarching elements of the broad concept of the best interests of the child. These elements must guide the interpretation of the Brussels IIb Regulation.
The principle of the best interests of the child, guaranteed by Article 24(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, must be complied with when drafting and interpreting rules on jurisdiction in European family law. Although the EU legislator has essentially fulfilled its obligations under Article 24(2), further legislative improvements to strengthen the best interests of the child in jurisdiction law are still possible. Regarding the interpretation of the Brussels IIb Regulation and the Maintenance Regulation, the case law of the ECJ is not consistent. Although the Court regularly refers to the best interests of the child, its reasoning often remains one-dimensional. In fact, the significance of the principle depends on the regulatory context: the best interests of the child in matters of parental responsibility differ from those in maintenance law. Thus, the best interests of the child within the meaning of the Maintenance Regulation tend to reinforce the general objective of the Regulation, which is to protect the maintenance creditor. The situation is more complex in the jurisdiction system of the Brussels IIb Regulation. The various general grounds for jurisdiction, e.g., jurisdiction at the child's habitual residence, are based on certain ideas about where conducting proceedings typically serves the interests of the child. If these general rules do not optimally reflect the individual situation, the agreement and transfer of jurisdiction allow for responding to the individual case. Both the standardised and case-specific rules on jurisdiction are based on overarching elements of the broad concept of the best interests of the child. These elements must guide the interpretation of the Brussels IIb Regulation.
Born 1996; studied law at the University of Münster; passed her first state law examination in 2019; research assistant at the Institute of German and International Family Law at the University of Münster; PhD in 2025; legal clerkship at the Regional Court of Münster.
| Erscheint lt. Verlag | 30.1.2026 |
|---|---|
| Reihe/Serie | Studien zum ausländischen und internationalen Privatrecht |
| Verlagsort | Tübingen |
| Sprache | deutsch |
| Maße | 155 x 232 mm |
| Themenwelt | Recht / Steuern ► EU / Internationales Recht |
| Recht / Steuern ► Privatrecht / Bürgerliches Recht ► Internationales Privatrecht | |
| Schlagworte | Art. 24 GRCh • Brüssel IIb-VO • Elterliche Verantwortung • EuGH • Europäisches Familienrecht • Europäisches Privatrecht • Familienverfahrensrecht • Gewöhnlicher Aufenthalt • Internationale Zuständigkeit • Kindesentführung • Kindeswohl • Schutz des Kindes • unionsrechtliche Auslegung • Unterhaltsrecht • Unterhaltsverordnung • UnthVO • Zuständigkeitsrecht • Zuständigkeitsübertragung |
| ISBN-13 | 9783162001689 / 9783162001689 |
| Zustand | Neuware |
| Informationen gemäß Produktsicherheitsverordnung (GPSR) | |
| Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt? |
Mehr entdecken
aus dem Bereich
aus dem Bereich
der Pflichtstoff
Buch | Softcover (2025)
C.H.Beck (Verlag)
CHF 41,70
Buch | Softcover (2025)
C.H.Beck (Verlag)
CHF 48,85
bildende Kunst, Architektur, Design und Fotografie im deutschen und …
Buch | Hardcover (2024)
Mohr Siebeck (Verlag)
CHF 124,60
