Die Beweislast bei Kollisionsnormen
2010
Mohr Siebeck (Hersteller)
9783161514166 (ISBN)
Mohr Siebeck (Hersteller)
9783161514166 (ISBN)
Maximilian Seibl deals with the burden of proof in respect to German and European private international law provisions, more specifically with the question as to how a "non liquet" situation can be solved and what consequences for the parties of a lawsuit result from this.
Maximilian Seibl deals with the burden of proof in respect to German and European private international law provisions, more specifically with the question as to how a "non liquet" situation can be solved and what consequences for the parties of a lawsuit result from this. The problem derives from the structure of private international law provisions which establish a connection between the facts of the case and the applicable law by the so-called "connecting factor". In many cases one party claims the existence of a certain connecting factor pointing to a specific legal system whereas the other party denies this connection and alleges the applicability of another legal system based on the same connecting factor; if it remains uncertain whether the connecting factor actually points to the one or the other legal system, it is indispensable to find a solution. As the connecting factor usually features an open character - i.e. it can establish a connection with every existing legal system on principle - whereas substantive law provisions only distinguish between the existence and the non-existence of certain facts, the conventional principles of the burden of proof must be modified. The book offers a differentiated solution to this problem that keeps the connection with those principles but also takes the private international law and the respective procedural implications into consideration.
Maximilian Seibl deals with the burden of proof in respect to German and European private international law provisions, more specifically with the question as to how a "non liquet" situation can be solved and what consequences for the parties of a lawsuit result from this. The problem derives from the structure of private international law provisions which establish a connection between the facts of the case and the applicable law by the so-called "connecting factor". In many cases one party claims the existence of a certain connecting factor pointing to a specific legal system whereas the other party denies this connection and alleges the applicability of another legal system based on the same connecting factor; if it remains uncertain whether the connecting factor actually points to the one or the other legal system, it is indispensable to find a solution. As the connecting factor usually features an open character - i.e. it can establish a connection with every existing legal system on principle - whereas substantive law provisions only distinguish between the existence and the non-existence of certain facts, the conventional principles of the burden of proof must be modified. The book offers a differentiated solution to this problem that keeps the connection with those principles but also takes the private international law and the respective procedural implications into consideration.
Geboren 1980; Studium der Rechtswissenschaft in Regensburg; seit 2005 Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter an der Universität Regensburg, seit 2009 Referendar am Landgericht Regensburg; 2009 Promotion.
| Erscheint lt. Verlag | 14.1.2010 |
|---|---|
| Reihe/Serie | Studien zum ausländischen und internationalen Privatrecht |
| Verlagsort | Tübingen |
| Sprache | deutsch |
| Themenwelt | Recht / Steuern ► Allgemeines / Lexika |
| Recht / Steuern ► EU / Internationales Recht | |
| Recht / Steuern ► Privatrecht / Bürgerliches Recht ► Internationales Privatrecht | |
| Recht / Steuern ► Privatrecht / Bürgerliches Recht ► Zivilverfahrensrecht | |
| Schlagworte | Beweislast • Kollisionsnormen • Mohr Siebeck |
| ISBN-13 | 9783161514166 / 9783161514166 |
| Zustand | Neuware |
| Informationen gemäß Produktsicherheitsverordnung (GPSR) | |
| Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt? |