Souveränität und Verfahrensrecht
Eine Untersuchung der aus dem Völkerrecht ableitbaren Grenzen staatlicher extraterritorialer Jurisdiktion im Verfahrensrecht
2024
Mohr Siebeck (Hersteller)
978-3-16-162970-9 (ISBN)
Mohr Siebeck (Hersteller)
978-3-16-162970-9 (ISBN)
Wann sind grenzüberschreitende Verfahrenspraktiken angemessen? Joachim Bertele erörtert dies unter Berücksichtigung des allgemeinen Völkerrechts.
Wann sind grenzüberschreitende Verfahrenspraktiken angemessen? Joachim Bertele erörtert dies unter Berücksichtigung des allgemeinen Völkerrechts. How can a plaintiff sue effectively to obtain his rights when the defendant resides abroad and the defendant's assets and/or the necessary evidence are also situated in another country? Which court has jurisdiction, what consequences could this have for legal assistance and which rules govern discovery proceedings? These matters are generally regulated by national law. However it is often maintained that limits to extraterritorial jurisdiction can be derived from international law and the concept of sovereignty. The author attempts to define those limits stemming from governmental practice and applies them to the procedural laws of England, the USA and Germany, arriving at a result which is more Anglo-American than German. He deals with a variety of procedural institutions, among which are the Mareva injunctions, Anton Piller orders, American and English pretrial discoveries and their German equivalents.
Wann sind grenzüberschreitende Verfahrenspraktiken angemessen? Joachim Bertele erörtert dies unter Berücksichtigung des allgemeinen Völkerrechts. How can a plaintiff sue effectively to obtain his rights when the defendant resides abroad and the defendant's assets and/or the necessary evidence are also situated in another country? Which court has jurisdiction, what consequences could this have for legal assistance and which rules govern discovery proceedings? These matters are generally regulated by national law. However it is often maintained that limits to extraterritorial jurisdiction can be derived from international law and the concept of sovereignty. The author attempts to define those limits stemming from governmental practice and applies them to the procedural laws of England, the USA and Germany, arriving at a result which is more Anglo-American than German. He deals with a variety of procedural institutions, among which are the Mareva injunctions, Anton Piller orders, American and English pretrial discoveries and their German equivalents.
Geboren 1967; 1987-92 Studium der Rechtswissenschaften in Konstanz und Genf; 1992-95 Rechtsreferendariat in Freiburg; 1988-93 wiss. Hilfskraft und zeitweise Assistent an den Universitäten Konstanz und Freiburg; 1995-97 Mitarbeiter an der Universität Köln; 1995-96 LL.M. Cambridge (England); 1997 Promotion; seit 1997 Ausbildung im Auswärtigen Amt in Bonn.
| Erscheint lt. Verlag | 1.7.2024 |
|---|---|
| Reihe/Serie | Veröffentlichungen zum Verfahrensrecht |
| Verlagsort | Tübingen |
| Sprache | deutsch |
| Themenwelt | Recht / Steuern ► EU / Internationales Recht |
| Recht / Steuern ► Privatrecht / Bürgerliches Recht ► Zivilverfahrensrecht | |
| Schlagworte | Souveränität • Verfahrensrecht • Völkerrecht |
| ISBN-10 | 3-16-162970-1 / 3161629701 |
| ISBN-13 | 978-3-16-162970-9 / 9783161629709 |
| Zustand | Neuware |
| Informationen gemäß Produktsicherheitsverordnung (GPSR) | |
| Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt? |
Mehr entdecken
aus dem Bereich
aus dem Bereich
