The Scope and Limits of Protection for Distinctive Signs against the Community Design
The Application and Implications of Art. 25 (1) (e) of the Community Designs Regulation
Seiten
2012
Nomos (Verlag)
978-3-8329-7910-2 (ISBN)
Nomos (Verlag)
978-3-8329-7910-2 (ISBN)
- Titel ist leider vergriffen;
keine Neuauflage - Artikel merken
Das Werk untersucht den Anwendungsbereich von Art. 25 (1) (e) CDR. Die Vorschrift regelt die Nichtigkeit eines Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters aufgrund der Verletzung eines jüngeren Geschmacksmusters, das ein Zeichen mit Unterscheidungskraft verwendet. Die Autorin analysiert die Vorteile, Nachteile und das verborgene Potenzial dieser Vorschrift.
This book addresses the application and the implications of Art. 25(1)(e) CDR - the basis for invalidation of a Community design on the basis of infringement of a prior distinctive sign. This potentially attractive provision, allowing for an invalidation with reference to various legal provisions, results to date in a lower number of invalidations than Art. 25(1)(b) CDR - the other basis for invalidation available for the owners of distinctive signs.The analysis covers the scope and limits of protection of trade marks, trade names, company symbols, work titles and names, with reference to the EU-harmonised rules and the national German law. This examination is a starting point for addressing some of the controversial issues concerning the application of Art. 25(1)(e) CDR as a ground for invalidation, such as the application of limitations to the right to a distinctive sign in design invalidity proceedings, or the relationship between the invalidation on the basis of lack of novelty, lack of individual character and based on infringement of prior rights.
This book addresses the application and the implications of Art. 25(1)(e) CDR - the basis for invalidation of a Community design on the basis of infringement of a prior distinctive sign. This potentially attractive provision, allowing for an invalidation with reference to various legal provisions, results to date in a lower number of invalidations than Art. 25(1)(b) CDR - the other basis for invalidation available for the owners of distinctive signs.The analysis covers the scope and limits of protection of trade marks, trade names, company symbols, work titles and names, with reference to the EU-harmonised rules and the national German law. This examination is a starting point for addressing some of the controversial issues concerning the application of Art. 25(1)(e) CDR as a ground for invalidation, such as the application of limitations to the right to a distinctive sign in design invalidity proceedings, or the relationship between the invalidation on the basis of lack of novelty, lack of individual character and based on infringement of prior rights.
| Erscheint lt. Verlag | 25.9.2012 |
|---|---|
| Reihe/Serie | Munich Intellectual Property Law Center – MIPLC ; 17 |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Maße | 153 x 227 mm |
| Gewicht | 168 g |
| Themenwelt | Recht / Steuern ► Wirtschaftsrecht ► Urheberrecht |
| Schlagworte | Europäisches Wirtschaftsrecht • Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz • Markenrecht • Markenrecht (MarkenR) • Urheberrecht / Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Medie • Urheberrecht / Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Medienrecht |
| ISBN-10 | 3-8329-7910-7 / 3832979107 |
| ISBN-13 | 978-3-8329-7910-2 / 9783832979102 |
| Zustand | Neuware |
| Informationen gemäß Produktsicherheitsverordnung (GPSR) | |
| Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt? |
Mehr entdecken
aus dem Bereich
aus dem Bereich
gewerblicher Rechtsschutz, Urheberrecht, Wettbewerbsrecht
Buch | Softcover (2025)
UTB (Verlag)
CHF 82,55
