Power, Knowledge, and Covid-19
Routledge (Verlag)
978-1-041-22482-2 (ISBN)
- Noch nicht erschienen (ca. Mai 2026)
- Versandkostenfrei
- Auch auf Rechnung
- Artikel merken
Through tightly argued case studies, Alex Broadbent and Pieter Streicher reconstruct how early modelling distinctions (notably the suppression/mitigation frame) and threshold-based reasoning made lockdown the default; how debates on masking and vaccination hardened into dogma; and how rival views were sidelined through credentialing, gatekeeping, and the control of forums. The book names and analyses five recurring features of this orthodoxy—methodological rigidity, scientific dogma, suppression of dissent, indirect political authority (“follow the science”), and scientific injustice—and shows how each shaped decisions across diverse settings.
Pairing clear conceptual analysis with accessible evidence reviews, the authors probe where models misled, where uncertainty was overstated or understated, and where costs, context, and equity were neglected—especially in low-resource settings. Rather than relitigating the pandemic, they offer a practical framework for recognising when science and policy converge too tightly, how to keep plurality alive under pressure, and how to design governance that preserves expertise without closing down legitimate choice. For readers in philosophy, public health, policy, and beyond, this is a concise, non-polemical account of what went wrong, what went right, and how to do better next time.
Alex Broadbent is Professor of Philosophy at Durham University, Visiting Professor at the University of Johannesburg, and Director of the Centre for Philosophy of Epidemiology, Medicine, and Public Health. Previous books include Philosophy of Epidemiology (2013), Philosophy for Graduate Students (2016) and Philosophy of Medicine (2019), and he edited The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Public Health (2023, with Sridhar Venkatapuram) and The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Medicine (2025). Pieter Streicher is a Research Associate at the Centre for Philosophy of Epidemiology, Medicine, and Public Health, at the University of Johannesburg and Durham University.
Introduction; 1. Scientific Orthodoxy; 2. The Politics of Method in Epidemiology; 3. Methodological Rigidity; 4. The Scientific Construction of Lockdown; 5. Scientific Dogma and Lockdown; 6. Scientific Dogma and Masks; 7. Scientific Dogma and Covid-19 Vaccines; 8. Suppression of Dissent and the Great Barrington Declaration; 9. Indirect Political Authority: Following the Science; 10. Scientific Injustice in the Covid-19 Pandemic; 11. Conclusion; References; Index.
| Erscheint lt. Verlag | 1.5.2026 |
|---|---|
| Zusatzinfo | 1 Tables, black and white; 1 Line drawings, black and white; 21 Halftones, black and white; 22 Illustrations, black and white |
| Verlagsort | London |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Maße | 152 x 229 mm |
| Themenwelt | Geisteswissenschaften ► Philosophie ► Ethik |
| Medizin / Pharmazie ► Medizinische Fachgebiete ► Medizinethik | |
| Studium ► Querschnittsbereiche ► Geschichte / Ethik der Medizin | |
| Naturwissenschaften | |
| ISBN-10 | 1-041-22482-6 / 1041224826 |
| ISBN-13 | 978-1-041-22482-2 / 9781041224822 |
| Zustand | Neuware |
| Informationen gemäß Produktsicherheitsverordnung (GPSR) | |
| Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt? |
aus dem Bereich
