A Philosophy for Scientists
Seiten
2015
ShieldCrest (Verlag)
978-1-910176-76-4 (ISBN)
ShieldCrest (Verlag)
978-1-910176-76-4 (ISBN)
- Keine Verlagsinformationen verfügbar
- Artikel merken
A spark of truth. A soul is partly made of thoughts. Thoughts are mathematical waves. Anything mathematical is eternal? ("Non-perishable") Thus souls are immortal. Afterlife is for souls, not for bodies. Fermat (1601-1665) did have a proof for Fermat Last Theorem, which was not found because of an intellectual planet - Middle Age
A philosophy for mathematicians and physicists I published "About a time not totally ordered" in WSEAS conference MCSS'15 in Dubai, 22 February 2015 (brochure). WSEAS : world science and engineering academy and society. MCSS'15 : mathematical computational and statistical sciences 2015. A philosophical approach to Fermat Last Theorem Fermat did not make public his proof for two reasons: It was only an outline of a proof and he was not satisfied with it (some case missing), It would have been considered blasphemous by the Church because of some infinite not existing. He would have had the same problem as Galileo Galilei. Equation of Fermat : Considering the equation with infinite products; z.z.z.z...=x.x.x.x...+y.y.y.y...And considering countable axiom of choice for, at most, y elements sets; We assume 5<=x<=y C(2 through y) Something which exists equal to something which does not exist (z.z.z...z...) The equation has no solution. Does it imply that the finite equations for n>= 5 have no solutions? Intuitively, for me, it is the case. The relation between finite and infinite has to be investigated according to: Godel theorem that we are always in need of new axioms.
CUSTOM-MADE AXIOM FOR THE PROOF OF FERMAT LAST THEOREM : The disjoint union of a Cartesian product of a set (of a number of elements >=5) a number of times >=5 and of another (OF greater CARDINALITY) set the same number of times being OF THE SAME CARDINALITY THAN a Cartesian product of a third set the same number of times MAKES : The equality of the sum of the two cardinalities of the two first infinite Cartesian products with the Cardinality of the third infinite product holds. (for a set theoretical proof) Mr Andreas Blass wrote in 2002 about a complication for x,y and z integers less than 5 in : http://www.math.lsa.umich.edu/~ablass/dpcc.pdf After centuries of research, we should have thought that a new axiom is needed for Fermat Last Theorem. The creativity of Fermat should not be doubted. The proof of Fermat used an equation with infinite products. It is completed by a set theoretical explanation. I am the author of "An axiom to settle the continuum hypothesis ?"Logic Colloquium 2004 (by title).
A philosophy for mathematicians and physicists I published "About a time not totally ordered" in WSEAS conference MCSS'15 in Dubai, 22 February 2015 (brochure). WSEAS : world science and engineering academy and society. MCSS'15 : mathematical computational and statistical sciences 2015. A philosophical approach to Fermat Last Theorem Fermat did not make public his proof for two reasons: It was only an outline of a proof and he was not satisfied with it (some case missing), It would have been considered blasphemous by the Church because of some infinite not existing. He would have had the same problem as Galileo Galilei. Equation of Fermat : Considering the equation with infinite products; z.z.z.z...=x.x.x.x...+y.y.y.y...And considering countable axiom of choice for, at most, y elements sets; We assume 5<=x<=y C(2 through y) Something which exists equal to something which does not exist (z.z.z...z...) The equation has no solution. Does it imply that the finite equations for n>= 5 have no solutions? Intuitively, for me, it is the case. The relation between finite and infinite has to be investigated according to: Godel theorem that we are always in need of new axioms.
CUSTOM-MADE AXIOM FOR THE PROOF OF FERMAT LAST THEOREM : The disjoint union of a Cartesian product of a set (of a number of elements >=5) a number of times >=5 and of another (OF greater CARDINALITY) set the same number of times being OF THE SAME CARDINALITY THAN a Cartesian product of a third set the same number of times MAKES : The equality of the sum of the two cardinalities of the two first infinite Cartesian products with the Cardinality of the third infinite product holds. (for a set theoretical proof) Mr Andreas Blass wrote in 2002 about a complication for x,y and z integers less than 5 in : http://www.math.lsa.umich.edu/~ablass/dpcc.pdf After centuries of research, we should have thought that a new axiom is needed for Fermat Last Theorem. The creativity of Fermat should not be doubted. The proof of Fermat used an equation with infinite products. It is completed by a set theoretical explanation. I am the author of "An axiom to settle the continuum hypothesis ?"Logic Colloquium 2004 (by title).
Adib Ben Jebara is a statistician and qualitician. He spent his career in a utility company in Tunisia and is the author of 5 books written in French.
| Erscheint lt. Verlag | 27.8.2015 |
|---|---|
| Verlagsort | Grendon Underwood |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Maße | 148 x 210 mm |
| Themenwelt | Mathematik / Informatik ► Mathematik |
| ISBN-10 | 1-910176-76-1 / 1910176761 |
| ISBN-13 | 978-1-910176-76-4 / 9781910176764 |
| Zustand | Neuware |
| Informationen gemäß Produktsicherheitsverordnung (GPSR) | |
| Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt? |
Mehr entdecken
aus dem Bereich
aus dem Bereich
Von Logik und Mengenlehre bis Zahlen, Algebra, Graphen und …
Buch | Softcover (2024)
De Gruyter Oldenbourg (Verlag)
CHF 104,90
Grundlagen für das Bachelor-Studium
Buch | Hardcover (2023)
Hanser (Verlag)
CHF 55,95
Analysis und Lineare Algebra mit Querverbindungen
Buch | Hardcover (2022)
Springer Spektrum (Verlag)
CHF 97,95
