How to Defend Humane Ideals
Substitutes for Objectivity
Seiten
2008
University of Nebraska Press (Verlag)
978-0-8032-1795-9 (ISBN)
University of Nebraska Press (Verlag)
978-0-8032-1795-9 (ISBN)
One of the principal moral and psychological problems of our time is whether humane ideals can be defended. Loss of faith in the objectivity of ethics has encouraged a sense of hopelessness. James R. Flynn rejects attempts to salvage ethical objectivity as futile and counterproductive. Instead, he uses philosophical analysis to demonstrate the relevance of logic and evidence to moral debate.
One of the principal moral and psychological problems of our time is whether humane ideals can be defended. Loss of faith in the objectivity of ethics has encouraged a sense of hopelessness. The notion that no ideal is better than any other, that a humane commitment has no rational advantage over Nietzsche's contempt for ordinary people, has been accused of leaving our civilization without self-confidence or a purpose. James R. Flynn rejects attempts to salvage ethical objectivity as futile and counterproductive. Instead, he uses philosophical analysis to demonstrate the relevance of logic and evidence to moral debate. He then uses modern social science to refute racists, Social Darwinists, Nietzsche, and the meritocracy thesis of The Bell Curve. Flynn concludes that the great post-Enlightenment project—justice for all races and classes, the reduction of inequality, and the abolition of privilege—retains its moral dignity and relevance.
One of the principal moral and psychological problems of our time is whether humane ideals can be defended. Loss of faith in the objectivity of ethics has encouraged a sense of hopelessness. The notion that no ideal is better than any other, that a humane commitment has no rational advantage over Nietzsche's contempt for ordinary people, has been accused of leaving our civilization without self-confidence or a purpose. James R. Flynn rejects attempts to salvage ethical objectivity as futile and counterproductive. Instead, he uses philosophical analysis to demonstrate the relevance of logic and evidence to moral debate. He then uses modern social science to refute racists, Social Darwinists, Nietzsche, and the meritocracy thesis of The Bell Curve. Flynn concludes that the great post-Enlightenment project—justice for all races and classes, the reduction of inequality, and the abolition of privilege—retains its moral dignity and relevance.
A professor emeritus at the University of Otago, New Zealand, James R. Flynn is the author of Asian Americans: Achievement beyond IQ and Race, IQ, and Jensen. He has been profiled in Scientific American, and his research has been reviewed in Nature and Newsweek.
Introduction: The Problem1. Truth-Tests and What Has Been LostPart One: The Limitations of Philosophy2. Plato and Thrasymachus; 3. Truth-Tests and Proof; 4. Kant and Sister Simplice; Transition: An Agenda: 5. Morality and Moral DebatePart Two: The Potency of Social Science6. Race and Class; 7. Superpeople and Supermen; 8. Justice and Meritocracy; 9. Humanism and Postmodernism; Conclusion: Unsolved Problems; 10. The Personal and the Conventional
| Verlagsort | Lincoln |
|---|---|
| Sprache | englisch |
| Gewicht | 352 g |
| Themenwelt | Geisteswissenschaften ► Philosophie ► Ethik |
| Geisteswissenschaften ► Philosophie ► Logik | |
| ISBN-10 | 0-8032-1795-1 / 0803217951 |
| ISBN-13 | 978-0-8032-1795-9 / 9780803217959 |
| Zustand | Neuware |
| Informationen gemäß Produktsicherheitsverordnung (GPSR) | |
| Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt? |
Mehr entdecken
aus dem Bereich
aus dem Bereich
Buch | Hardcover (2025)
Suhrkamp (Verlag)
CHF 32,15
eine Philosophie des Lebenssinns
Buch | Hardcover (2025)
Suhrkamp (Verlag)
CHF 36,40
