The Case for Proto-Mark
A Study in the Synoptic Problem
Seiten
Delbert Burkett liefert neue Informationen, welche die Theorie der Markuspriorität und die Deuteromarkus-Hypothese infrage stellen. Er bietet die derzeit umfassendsten Argumente für die Proto-Markus-Hypothese und schließt, dass diese Theorie das Textmaterial des Markus am besten erklärt.
Delbert Burkett addresses the Synoptic Problem, the question of what sources were used by the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke). The most common explanation for the material shared by Matthew and Luke (the double tradition) is that Matthew and Luke both used a source now lost, called Q. If we adopt the Q hypothesis to account for the double tradition, then what theory best accounts for the material that Matthew and Luke share with Mark (the Markan material)? Three main theories have been proposed: Matthew and Luke used the Gospel of Mark as a source (the standard theory of Markan priority), Matthew and Luke used a revised version of Mark's gospel (the Deutero-Mark hypothesis), or all three evangelists used a source similar to, but earlier than, the Gospel of Mark (the Proto-Mark hypothesis). Delbert Burkett provides new data that calls into question the standard theory of Markan priority and the Deutero-Mark hypothesis. He offers the most comprehensive case to date for the Proto-Mark hypothesis, concluding that this theory best accounts for the Markan material.
Delbert Burkett addresses the Synoptic Problem, the question of what sources were used by the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke). The most common explanation for the material shared by Matthew and Luke (the double tradition) is that Matthew and Luke both used a source now lost, called Q. If we adopt the Q hypothesis to account for the double tradition, then what theory best accounts for the material that Matthew and Luke share with Mark (the Markan material)? Three main theories have been proposed: Matthew and Luke used the Gospel of Mark as a source (the standard theory of Markan priority), Matthew and Luke used a revised version of Mark's gospel (the Deutero-Mark hypothesis), or all three evangelists used a source similar to, but earlier than, the Gospel of Mark (the Proto-Mark hypothesis). Delbert Burkett provides new data that calls into question the standard theory of Markan priority and the Deutero-Mark hypothesis. He offers the most comprehensive case to date for the Proto-Mark hypothesis, concluding that this theory best accounts for the Markan material.
Born 1949; 1989 PhD; 1996-99 Assistant Professor, 1999-2010 Associate Professor, since 2010 Professor of Religious Studies at Louisiana State University; 2010-16 Chair of the Department of Philosophy & Religious Studies.
| Erscheinungsdatum | 01.03.2018 |
|---|---|
| Reihe/Serie | Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament |
| Verlagsort | Tübingen |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Maße | 162 x 236 mm |
| Gewicht | 648 g |
| Themenwelt | Religion / Theologie ► Christentum ► Bibelausgaben / Bibelkommentare |
| Geisteswissenschaften ► Religion / Theologie ► Judentum | |
| Schlagworte | Agreements • Christentum • Deutero-Mark • Gospels • hypothesis • Markan • Markan Priority • Minor • Minor Agreements • priority • Synoptic • Synoptic Gospels • two-document • two-document hypothesis |
| ISBN-13 | 9783161555169 / 9783161555169 |
| Zustand | Neuware |
| Informationen gemäß Produktsicherheitsverordnung (GPSR) | |
| Haben Sie eine Frage zum Produkt? |
Mehr entdecken
aus dem Bereich
aus dem Bereich
Buch | Softcover (2021)
De Gruyter (Verlag)
CHF 44,90
